Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Christianity. Show all posts

Monday, January 19, 2009

John 3:16

Interesting places that you will find the Bible verse John 3:16 printed that you may not have expected:

- On the bottom rim of an In-N-Out Burger paper cup.

- On the bottom of a shopping bag from Forever 21 (my daughters favorite clothing store).

- Tornado Fuel Saver prints it on their box as well.


"For God so loved the world, that he gave his only Son, that whoever believes in him should not perish but have eternal life." John 3:16

Monday, October 27, 2008

Trick Or Treat

I remember trick or treating in the 'olden' days when I was knee high to a grasshopper. I remember getting dressed up like a pirate, clipping and gluing the crepe beard on my face along with the obligatory eye patch and then launching out into the neighborhood with my sister and pillow cases in tow to get in on the free candy bonanza.

For some reason down through the years (particularly when my own children came along) I decided that sending my kids on beggar's night to get candy was tantamount to celebrating the devil's holiday - so at the Smith household no one went trick or treating. Somewhere along the line the church where we served began offering a Halloween alternative that involved dressing up in costumes and getting free candy. This was convenient, because now we could dress up, get free candy and feel good about it because we were taking candy from church people at church - this was waaaaay different than going trick or treating....right?

Last year I finally realized the foolishness of it all and began to reconsider the Smith prohibition on trick or treating.

This may sound funny considering what I've just written - but we actually decided to let our kids go trick or treating.

My inescapable thought was - if going trick or treating was celebrating Halloween - then what was attending a Halloween 'alternative' at a church that had the look and feel of going trick or treating - complete with costumes and free candy? If my kids walk around a church gym, hallway or parking lot collecting free candy - how is that any different than walking the streets of my neighborhood taking candy from the very people that I'm trying to reach for Christ? Is the candy given at church sanctified - or is it just candy? Is being in costume at church less celebratory than just wearing it in my neighborhood?

Somehow I lost the connection of how dressing up and collecting free candy did anything to celebrate Halloween or glorify the devil. If we do that on church property does it magically become not celebrating Halloween? Or is the simple truth that neither of these expressions is celebrating Halloween, but rather just some harmless fun? I emphatically decided the latter. A born again Christian does not celebrate an ungodly holiday by dressing up and getting candy - no more than people practicing the Christmas tradition of Wassailing do (you know, "bring me figgy pudding...we won't leave until we get some").

That little crepe beard wearing pirate from the 70's turned out to be a preacher and church planter - not a Satan worshiper. Nor have I ever had the inclination to serve Satan as a result of my youthful trick or treating.

I completely respect (and respectfully disagree) with the view of those who feel that Christian's who go trick or treating are celebrating demons - I only ask that you be consistent with that view and not dress up and go to celebrate Halloween at a church then.

Oddly enough, trick or treat is this Thursday night and my kids have no desire to go. Go figure. Apparently last year satisfied their interest. I guess they discovered that there are easier ways to come up with a few handfuls of candy that don't involve walking a couple miles.

If you disagree, please help me see where I'm missing it. How does trick or treating become celebrating the devil? For comparison - Atheists exchange gifts at Christmas without celebrating Christmas (sadly). Are they unwittingly celebrating Jesus and becoming Christians by doing so?

Friday, October 3, 2008

Sunday Segregation

This is very surprising to me. Apparently Sunday continues to be the most segregated day of the week:

"The Rev. Paul Earl Sheppard had recently become the senior pastor of a suburban church in California when a group of parishioners came to him with a disturbing personal question.

They were worried because the racial makeup of their small church was changing. They warned Sheppard that the church's newest members would try to seize control because members of their race were inherently aggressive. What was he was going to do if more of "them" tried to join their church?"

Read the rest HERE.

Monday, September 29, 2008

Christians And Christ Followers

Are you a Christian or a "Christ Follower"? Is there a difference? Does it matter? For some - apparently so. I've been somewhat curious as to what's behind this new fad that would cause life long Christians to want to suddenly be referred to as "Christ follower" instead of as a "Christian". Don't get me wrong - a Christ follower is a very good thing and I'm one myself. But why the change? What's the big deal? Is it bad to be called a "Christian"? After all, "Christ followers" have been called "Christians" for nearly 2,000 years. The name started all the way back in Acts 11:26 where we learn that the disciples were first called Christians in the city of Antioch. The Apostle Peter later added: "However, if you suffer as a Christian, do not be ashamed, but praise God that you bear that name." 1 Peter 4:16. I do praise God that I bear that name - Christian. And that's why I'm not sure we should be so quick to abandon that name. It's fitly described believers for the last 2,000 years - and now it suddenly doesn't work for some?

I get that there have been plenty of hypocrites, bad eggs and just plain lousy representations of Christianity that have without question hurt the name of Jesus and the name "Christian". But is that alone a good reason to abandon the name 'Christian' - given that the name 'Christian' literally means 'Christ follower' anyway?

I'm a big fan of Ohio State football. I went to the Ohio State/Michigan game a couple of years ago in Columbus with a friend of mine who is a Michigan fan. I wore my scarlet and gray and he wore the Michigan maize and blue. Throughout the day he was treated OK by most of the fans. There were, however, exceptions - exceptions who acted like absolute idiots and embarrassed me as an Ohio State fan. Since that time and despite those bad eggs, I haven't once considered calling myself a 'scarlet and gray follower' instead of a Buckeye fan in order to distance myself from miscreants who like the same team as I. My friend is also smart enough to know that not all Buckeye fans act like some did at that game. I could give other examples - but the point is that you will find clueless, out of touch, ignorant people in ALL genre's of life - so are we going to find other names to label ourselves with when we find whatever term(s) we are labeled with is no longer cool?

History reveals that there have been plenty of fakes and frauds doing terrible things while they carried the name of Jesus - but that didn't cause Luther, Huss, Tyndale or Wesley to abandon the name Christian. Are we smarter than they were?

Do people who prefer the label "Christ follower" really think they they are going to outrun the negative examples and phonies who wear the name of Christ? Good luck with that. Give 'Christ Followers' enough time and they will undoubtedly garner more than their fair share of hypocrites as well. Then what happens? Another name change?

Part of this name change appears to be attempt to put distance between those believers whom they deem to be uncool and/or out of touch. Which leads me to this thought: I don't think we're smarter than the saints of old, but I do think we may be more smug. The smugness with which this "Christ follower" thing is coming off is what bothers me. It's a smugness fed by generational conceit. It's the old "I'm better/smarter/got-it-more-figured-out/ than you do" thinking.

Can we dispense with the 'label war' and let believers be who they are, and concern ourselves with loving our neighbors as ourselves while going after God with every fiber of our being? What's the point of mocking and belittling other believers anyway? Is this what a real 'Christ follower' should be doing?

I guess some believers love their labels more than they realize.

Friday, September 5, 2008

Pastoral Malpractice

"Suppose you were to contract a potentially serious medical condition and went to see a doctor. Upon asking him details about the diagnosis and medical consequences you found out that he does not take medical literature literally. In addition, he has not kept up on the latest medical research and has been out of medical school for several decades. He prefers to make his patients happy and comfortable rather than to force them to confront the truth about their health condition. Would you see such a doctor? Neither would I. Such a doctor eventually could be found guilty of malpractice....(if) our souls are more important than our bodies, why do people look to premier doctors to diagnose and treat their physical conditions but select a pastor who sidesteps truth when it comes to their eternal souls? That makes no sense. Apparently many do not truly believe that the condition of their souls is that important..."

Read the rest from Bob Dewaay HERE.

Monday, June 23, 2008

Must Be Lots Of Confused "Christians"

A Pew Forum survey has found that 57 percent of evangelical church attenders say that they believe many religions can lead to eternal life, which is in direct conflict with Biblical Christianity.

I suppose this shouldn't surprise me as I've long agreed with Dr. James Kennedy that 75-80% of church people have not experienced Biblical salvation.

Commenting on the report, Rice University sociologist of religion D. Michael Lindsay states, "The survey shows religion in America is, indeed, 3,000 miles wide and only three inches deep.

Indeed it does.

He goes on to say that, "There's a growing pluralistic impulse toward tolerance and that is having theological consequences."

More than that, it's having eternal consequences. When will American pastors who've been spinning their wheels trying to get people into church realize the importance of teaching Bible doctrines that declare and prove just why it is that Jesus is the only way to heaven and why that is so important? The Bible makes it crystal clear that salvation, eternal life and forgiveness of sins comes ONLY through Jesus Christ (Acts 4:11-12; John 14:6 to name a few verses).

To believe otherwise is to not believe in Jesus at all - for you'd be calling Him a liar. Jesus Himself declared this truth and it is reiterated throughout the entire Bible that He is indeed the only way to heaven.

Read the report HERE.

Monday, May 19, 2008

Pastor Mark Petric Update

I recently had the joy of watching a fellow pastor, Mark Petric, walk to the pulpit and give a powerful testimony of forgiveness. Last October, Pastor Mark's 16 year old son Daniel, shot him and his wife in head, claiming the life of Mark's wife Sue.


Mark sustained a gun shot wound that by all rights, should have taken his life. The doctors didn't seem to be very hopeful after the massive blood loss that he sustained as well - but God intervened, and today Mark is a walking, talking miracle.

To see the miracle healing of Mark even being alive, then to hear him speak of how he has not only forgiven his son, but how Daniel has completely given his life to Jesus Christ was extremely moving. Mark is even standing alongside of his son as he is facing prison time and an uncertain future.

This incredible story of forgiveness reminds me of the Biblical truth - With God, all things are possible!

Saturday, April 26, 2008

God On The Throne

You are my shepherd I have no need
You lead me by peaceful streams
And you refresh my life

You hold my hand and You guide my steps
I could walk through the valley of death
And I won't be afraid

Because You are in control
You are in control
You are in control

You cause everything to work together
You truly have a sovereign plan

And you know who I am
Any you made who I am
And you love who I am

Because You are in control

Friday, February 15, 2008

"Fundamental" Is Not A Bad Word

By Tim Wildmon

I am the way, and the truth, and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.
John 14:6

I am Christian fundamentalist. Meaning, for one, that I believe in the above declaration by Jesus Christ. This claim by Christ I believe to be absolute truth. For sure, when compared to other religious belief systems, this is an exclusionary statement.

It divides people. Either you subscribe to it, or you don’t. There is no in between. This is not a gray area. There are other quotes like this from Jesus found in the scripture. For instance in John 3:3 he says this: “Truly, truly, I say to you, unless one is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” In Luke 13:3 he said: “No, I tell you; but unless you repent, you will all likewise perish.”

Christian fundamentalists like me take these words literally. Jesus wasn’t talking metaphorically. He wasn’t talking in parables, as he was apt to do. He meant what he said and said what he meant.

In the last couple of years there have been a plethora of books written about the “dangers” of Christian fundamentalism. Some have reached the best-seller list such, as “American Theocracy: The Peril and Politics of Radical Religion, Oil, and Borrowed Money in the 21st Century,” by Kevin Phillips; “Kingdom Coming: The Rise of Christian Nationalism,” by Michelle Goldberg; “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War On America,” by Chris Hedges; “The Theocons: Secular America Under Siege,” Damon Linker; and, probably the world’s most famous atheist, Christopher Hitchens’ new book. “God Is Not Great: How Religion Poisons Everything....”

Read the full article Here.

Wednesday, February 13, 2008

I Don't Think I Can Go On Being A Christian

Those are the words of an 18 year old girl in a letter she wrote to her pastor. He posted the letter on his blog in order to receive feedback. Below is her letter:

"I am 18 an have been a member of Seacoast for about a year or so. I am looking for some answers to some big issues I am struggling with. My boyfriend and I are both Christians, but we are at a crossroads right now and though we believe in God, Jesus, and WANT to believe in Christianity, we are struggling.

First off, we started reading the old testament and a good bit doesn't make sense. For example, in the story of Job, towards the end God starts to talk about a fire breathing dragon. Another example, I do not remember the specific book, but a woman looked back and was "turned to a pillar of salt...."

Read the rest HERE. Feel free to leave a comment there or here.


What resource or book would you recommend to someone like this who is having a faith crisis? What would you tell them?

Monday, November 19, 2007

Great Illustration

Some of the most powerful words of Jesus Christ are: "Whoever would come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me." Jesus also said, "whoever does not bear his cross and come after Me cannot be My disciple."

Cross carrying, however, is not a popular message. In fact, it flies in the face of much of the current version of the 'bait and switch' gospel message that promises if you come to God you will receive 'rich rewards', or come to Christ and 'you'll be wealthy', or, 'you'll be a better business man', not to mention that 'God doesn't want you to ever suffer'. This modernized, sanitized version of the Gospel of Christ is completely void of the mention of trials, temptations and battles that we are scripturally promised to face as believers.

But the Word of God actually tells us to embrace our trials: "Count it all joy when you fall into various trials,  knowing that the testing of your faith produces patience.  But let patience have its perfect work, that you may be perfect and complete, lacking nothing." James 1:2-4. The Apostle Peter also tells us that when we are enduring trials, the genuineness of our faith is being tested so it will bring glory to Jesus Christ at his appearing. Carrying our cross is part of the gig as a true Christian.

This little illustration below powerfully shows the necessity of going through trials and suffering - the cross carrying - that we endure for the sake of Christ:











Tuesday, October 16, 2007

Why Unity In Doctrine Is Essential - Part 1

By Dr. Opal Reddin

We agree with David Wells when he says, "there is no Christian faith in the absence of 'sound doctrine' (1 Tim. 1:10; Tit. 1:9)." Without it, we have neither the Father nor the Son (2 Jn. 9). We are told to "contend earnestly for the faith once for all delivered to the saints" (Jude 3). We must "guard" this faith (2 Tim. 1:13-14; 4:3). We know that this faith was stated in propositional truths, for Paul wrote to the Corinthians: "I plead with you that you all speak the same thing and that there be no division among you, but that you be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment" (1 Cor. 1:10). It is on this basis that churches have statements of fundamental truths. Belief and practice are inextricably linked (1 Jn. 2:3-3:18).

There are two kinds of division, one of God and the other of Satan. When Paul warned against division, he was referring to bad division, caused by false doctrine. Some "depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons" (1 Tim. 4:1). In John's Epistles he warned, "Many antichrists have come . . .they went out from us, but they were not of us" (1 Jn. 2:18-19). Regarding fellowship, he wrote, "If anyone comes with another doctrine, do not receive him . . .for he who greets him shares in his evil deeds" (2 Jn. 10,11). Paul told the Romans to "mark those who cause division contrary to the doctrine which you have learned" and avoid them (16:17).

There is good, necessary division, the result of being separated from Error by the Truth (Jn. 17:17). Jesus said, "I came to bring division" (Lk. 12:51); He separated His Church from the Judaism that rejected Him (Jn. 1:11). Paul maintained this separation by exposing the Judaizing heresy as "another (accursed) Gospel" (Gal. 1:6-9). Without this division, Christianity would have gradually become merely a sect of Judaism.

Wednesday, October 3, 2007

Why Have Doctrines?

I came across an old letter written by Dr. Opal Reddin in response to some A/G ministers asking this question years ago. Given the current struggle that many face as to why it is important to believe the right things about Christianity and the Bible - thought this letter brings up some great points:


"Do we want doctrinal purity? Do we want doctrines? Referring to Pentecostals and Charismatics, one very popular speaker/author recently said that "people don't want doctrine, they just want Him (God)." The writer seems to believe that people can experience God without all the fuss about doctrine.

The Assemblies of God has been delineated as being strong on Experience and weak on Doctrine. Admittedly, we have been too busy trying to evangelize the world to take time to write many "scholarly" tomes, but we have known what we believe. In my time at Fuller Theological Seminary, I was often asked, "What does the AoG believe about this?" I suffered no embarrassment whatever as I always had an answer for any who asked about any doctrinal belief.

It's true that when the 300-plus Pentecostals met in Hot Springs, April 2, 1914 to form the General Council of the Assemblies of God they disdained a formal doctrinal statement. It indeed was a biblical experience they could not deny that had caused them to be driven out of their respective denominations. Since the majority were already "Bereans" and well grounded in the Word, they saw no need for a rigid creed.

(However) It was new "Revelation" that made the young movement realize the need for written "Statement of Fundamental Truths". The (new) "Revelation" was also termed "The New Issue", "Jesus Only", "Oneness", and "Pentecostal Unitarianism". To counteract what the majority could not accept, sixteen doctrines were enunciated at the fourth General Council in 1916. The second doctrinal statement, "The One True God", is almost as lengthy as all the others combined because of the need to defend Trinitarian doctrine against the errors of Unitarianism.

In Anointed To Serve, Dr. William Menzies wrote, "It is remarkable after all of these years the Statement of Fundamental Truths, as it was called, has remained virtually unchanged, with but minor rewording for the sake of clarification in recent years." (GPH, 1971, 119). Presently we face a deja vu: Many Pentecostals and Charismatics are saying ones belief about the Godhead does not matter. I urge each of you to review your understanding of the Trinity. In fact, since many of the "Latter Rain" false teachings are being recycled, why not teach our 16 fundamental doctrines to your congregation? A member of the board of directors told me last week that he's teaching them in Sunday school and the class is growing! They love doctrine, well taught."

In Spirit and Truth,

Opal Reddin


My note: We are definitely having deja vu again today! This time around I would urge our ministers to review their understanding of the Virgin Birth, Substitutionary Atonement, Inerrancy of Scripture and the reality of Hell, just to name of few. Because there are so called "Evangelicals" today who are questioning the veracity of these core doctrines of Christianity. People do love doctrine well taught. We've been doing a Wednesday night study of these 16 fundamental truths and the groups are growing. In fact, we've had better attendance for this study than any other - and folks even had to buy a book for their study groups. I think too often pastors underestimate the desire their people have to learn Biblical doctrine and be versed well enough to never "suffer embarrassment" from not being able to answer a question about their faith. In fact such knowledge may just keep them out of divorce court, the counselor's office, the Kingdom Hall, the Mormon Temple....

Tuesday, October 2, 2007

Fundamental Christians Cause Atheism?

From Newsbusters:

ABC may have set a loathsome new MSM low in insulting traditional Christians. On today's "Good Morning America," the network lumped the "Christan right" with the 9-11 Islamic terrorists as driving people to atheism.

Keying off an atheists convention being held this weekend, GMA ran a segment on the "Rise in Atheism." Seeking to explain the phenomenon, as images rolled first of the WTC in flames and then of a man placidly holding a sign that simply read "One Nation Under God" and of a display at a demonstration of the Ten Commandments, ABC's Liz Marlantes stated:

Some are reacting to religious extremism, like the Islamic fundamentalism behind the terrorist attacks of 9-11, but also the rise of the Christian right in the U.S.

So there it is. To ABC, traditional Christians are as responsible for making people doubt God as the 9-11 terrorists. People peacefully exercising their First Amendment rights by displaying the Ten Commandments or a sign containing an excerpt from the Pledge of Allegiance as faith-shattering as terrorists who murder thousands by flying airplanes into buildings.

Does MSM anti-Christian bias get any worse than this? ABC owes an apology.

NOTE: In making the case that atheism is growing, Marlantes mentioned that "Congress now has its first self-proclaimed atheist." But while displaying his image [shown here], ABC didn't in any way identify him. He is Pete Stark (D-Calif.)





My note: In the future prepare for the harshest criticism of Biblical Christianity to come from within the 'church'. Articles like this will give illustrative rise to emergents and others of their ilk as to why we shouldn't take the Bible literally, and why all good Christians should shun the 'fundamental' label. They would never use the term 'dumb down the gospel' but that is what will be promoted as hell is deconstructed, the atonement is diluted, the virgin birth is written off and holy living is something for narrow minded legalists.


Tuesday, September 18, 2007

How Saved Are We?

That’s a disturbing question.

But observing the average American Christian today, it’s painfully obvious that something has run amok. I’m not even talking about heretical movements that are flaunting false doctrine in abundance today - nor am I referring to declining church attendance. My concern is for those who are sitting in our pews.

The “sheep” are becoming more difficult to recognize as sheep. We’re undoubtedly reaping the fruit from decades of preaching a soft Savior, salvation without self denial, a crown without a cross and using unbiblical language like “accept” Jesus as one’s Savior (He accepts us).

So how many of our “sheep” have really experienced Biblical salvation? The late Dr. D. James Kennedy pondered the same question, when he stated that based on the empirical evidence, he had come to the conclusion that “75-80% of people attending church weren’t really saved.”

Jim Elliff essentially asks the same in his article about the Southern Baptist Church when he said: “When as many as 70-90% of “converts” are giving little if any evidence of being saved after their first weeks or months of emotional excitement, questions should be asked, both about our understanding of the gospel and about our methods.”

Questions indeed - and the biggest one - How saved are we?

Many church goers would say that they "know who they are in Christ” - but I must kindly beg to differ. Only 1-2% of Christians EVER share their faith - blatantly ignoring even an attempt at fulfilling the Great Commission. The divorce rate is actually higher in the church than it is in the world. (I've cited on this blog that the divorce rate among church attenders is actually higher than it is among atheists). The percentage of Christians involved in cohabitation and other sexual promiscuity rivals the world’s numbers. Again I wonder, how saved are we?

Ron Sider, author of The Scandal of the Evangelical Conscience says, “If American Christians simply gave a tithe rather than the current one-quarter of a tithe, there would be enough private Christian dollars to provide basic health care and education to all the poor of the earth. And we would still have an extra $60–70 billion left over for evangelism around the world.” Apparently us church folks aren’t the most generous bunch either. That flies in the face of the very definition of a true Christian.

Evidence points to the fact that, by and large, we have a defective church. And the reason? We have preached a defective message. We have done a big disservice to our hearers in two ways: We have failed to tell them the old life must end; and we have failed to definitively show them the new life in Him. The truth is our Americanized modern gospel has created a lot of followers who are not true sheep, but geese - as in, lost as a goose.

The sad and difficult part is, many actually believe they are saved merely because they may have said some sort of a prayer, perhaps have a church membership card in their wallets or maybe even have baptism waters dripping off of their face.

John MacArthur, speaking about some of these church attenders who populate the American church: “People are breezing through these wide, comfortable gates with all their baggage, their self needs, their self esteem, and their desire for fulfillment and self satisfaction. And the most horrible thing about it is, they think they are going to heaven.”

The preaching of Biblical salvation is long overdue. So how Biblical is our salvation? Here is Biblical salvation in a nutshell:

1. To be saved there has to be a complete, utter surrender and sellout to Jesus Christ. This is often referred to as “believing in Jesus” or “putting your trust” in Him. God’s holy Son died for the world. The Perfect One suffered a criminals death. He bore all of our sin on the cross. The Righteous Lamb died for foul sinners. He paid the price completely for sin. We sinned. He died. We were guilty. He was punished. We deserve death. He gave us life. We rejected Him. He accepted us. Salvation is through Him completely. We add NOTHING to our salvation. It’s a gift of God given by God’s grace, through faith in Jesus Christ the Righteous.

2. With this sellout, there is something called repentance. Repentance is a change of mind, a change of direction - we abandon the sin we used to partake in. Jesus described our salvation experience as being “born again”. That describes an upheaval. A drastic change. A brand new start. Does that sound familiar? When the Spirit of the Living God comes to inhabit our lives, there should be a big difference - a before and after - Liars stop lying. Thieves stop stealing.

It’s time to wake up the pew sitters in America with the truth. It may be shocking and offensive to many that have been lulled asleep by having their ears tickled, but it will be oh so healing, redemptive and life changing.

“Therefore He says: ‘Awake, you who sleep, arise from the dead, and Christ will give you light.” Ephesians 5:14.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Hybrid Christianity

In biology the term hybrid often refers to the offspring of two different species, or of two different genera. The end result is not always better and many times the offspring is sterile, unable to reproduce any fruit after it's kind. There may well be another type of hybrid roaming the earth today, the hybrid Christian. The species has blended a little truth with some deception and sadly thinks that they are OK. They have in fact created a God in their minds that does not exist and has no power to save them.

Paul, in 1 Corinthian speaks about this topic. He calls this hybrid - "carnal". Carnal Christians are those who talk the talk, but do not walk the walk. They make the claim, but do not deliver the goods. They use grace as an excuse for sin rather than knowing grace as the power of God to overcome sin.

The Bible says to remain carnal has dire results:

Romans 8:6-8 says: "For to be carnally minded is death, but to be spiritually minded is life and peace."

In Paul's day, people were claiming to know Christ but continuing on in sinful lifestyles. Not much has changed today. People say all the time that because they are a certain denomination or because they are in a certain church it's OK to do certain sin, because their church, they say, has no problem with it. The lead singer of the rock band, Blink 182, said at one point that he was a Christian – but he added something to the effect, “I’m the type that drinks and party’s and uses foul language.”

The Bible says:

“But know this, that in the last days perilous times will come: For men will be lovers of themselves, lovers of money, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, unloving, unforgiving, slanderers, without self-control, brutal, despisers of good, traitors, headstrong, haughty, lovers of pleasure rather than lovers of God, having a form of godliness but denying its power. And from such people turn away!" 2 Timothy 3:1-5.

That’s a huge deception in our culture for that 'type' of Christian doesn't exist. Biblically, there is only one kind of Christian, and that's the kind with a surrendered life to Christ and whose actions, words, deeds, practices and habits reflect Jesus Christ. Hybrid Christianity is turning the world off of Christianity because it's unable to produce fruit because it's sterile (having a form of godliness but lacking its power).

Perhaps we need a better understanding of what the grace of God is.

On seeing several criminals being led to the scaffold in the 16th century, English Protestant martyr John Bradford remarked, 'There but for the grace of God, goes John Bradford.'

We still say that today – except for the grace of God, there go I. What does that mean? It means I was on that path to hell, but a Power that is higher than I called the Grace of God came down and changed me – and now I’m eternally grateful because I’m not the man I used to be. I don't live in the sin I used to - because of grace! You see grace is the power to overcome sin – not an excuse to co-exist with it.